Note: This is a guest blog written by Alistair Cockburn 2009.07.25.
How wideband social media is changing the world’s cognitive structure
People working together is like a large brain performing a computation, but in which each neuron has legs and tends to wander off at random moments. Hutchins coined the phrase distributed cognition for when people work together to achieve an outcome (see the book “Cognition in the Wild”), but for my taste, “neurons with legs” paints a sharper picture.
.
.
If you can imagine that people working toward a common outcome – whether a play, a business initiative, a software release – are like neurons with legs, then it is clear why working in a war room with project maps on the wall has always been the preferred mode of intense collaboration.
.
.
Working in different locations is comparatively unattractive, even if it is the “way of the world.” Communication wasn’t really free to start with, and the cost shoots up dramatically as soon as the neurons can’t see or hear each other, or notice when the others have wandered off.
.
.
Software teams are getting practiced at working intensely across distances. The best teams use phone, voice– or video–Skype or equivalent, voice conferencing, online chat, online document collaborative and code synchronization tools to keep up with each other as much as they can … and of course, plane trips when they really want to communcate heavily.
(Why is it business people so often set up all the contract details by internet, but then fly to be in the same room when it comes time to close the deal?)
So far, pretty standard.
However, those communication mechanisms are deliberate, operating with the directed intention of transferring information from one wandering neuron to another. “Directed” is the key word.
Wideband social media adds a twist. By “wideband” social media, I mean broadcast media such as Twitter, Facebook, and geographic location revealing apps.
With wideband social media, the group of wandering neurons contribute to an emerging picture, which none of them could paint alone. The data that arrives is spontaneous, unpredictable, and informative in surprising ways.
“I’m going to lunch at the Mac.”
What information could this possibly hold? Well, if sent on Twitter or group-linked geopraphic locators, it produces a spontaneous get-together of friends and not-yet-friends, which produces a conversation, a company, a manifesto or a new friendship, all with long-term unexpected effects.
We’re only seeing the beginning of the story here.
Like any new technology, there is a dark side as well as a light. You can follow, but you can also be followed. Police can take steps to increase safety, or to oppress. The new GIS (geographic information systems) frankly scare me. I wonder how long before we forget who’s watching our movements and what they’re doing with it. However, that scary scenario is not part of this particular blog entry.
What is part of this entry is the question about what this means in a commercial context ( beneficent, let’s pretend, just for now
.
Wideband social media extends a company’s ears.
- A person doesn’t like (or does like!) your product – you get to hear about it in a casual online complaint. You can move to take care of it immediately, long before it would hit a customer service rep.
- You get to see trends in the marketplace early, through gossip, long before the retailers publish the trend in their public reports – or even before it hits their cash registers.
And getting back to the start of the story, how does this impact commercial cognition?
I don’t have the answer to that yet, but I see an outline. The outline is real and current, just not yet tagged with words. Competitive companies will work it out long before we writers have words around it.
What I see, though, is a corporate idea with millions of remote dendritic connections, remote cognitors that live inside a picture that changes as rapidly as whitewater rapids. The people help paint, recognize, understand, and further change the picture, all at the same time.
(End note: Teilhard de Chardin coined the term “noosphere” (no-o-sphere) in “The Phenomenon of Man” in the early-mid 20th century to describe what he saw as the natural evolution from atoms to multi-cellular organisms (us) to a cognitive entity in which we would be only contributors. Scientific meetings, then the www were considered to be early versions of the noosphere, but from what I’m seeing, both of those pale in comparison to what’s about to happen with broadband social media as enterprising groups realize the power of so many dendritic connections wandering around acting with wideband social media attachments.)
Alistair
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=654f6b5e-b3dc-4ad7-8dec-009808bf7758)

Follow Ghennipher on Twitter